View Full Version : Possible Mike Dunlap choices
superb1
06-18-2012, 10:53 PM
I know many may not know much about him but since we did a thread on Shaw, which prospects would you think Dunlap prefer us to draft. Other than Moe Harkless, who would fit his style.
dnbman
06-18-2012, 10:56 PM
I know many may not know much about him but since we did a thread on Shaw, which prospects would you think Dunlap prefer us to draft. Other than Moe Harkless, who would fit his style.
I'm wondering if this actually rules out Moe. The last thing you need in a locker room is someone that enters as the coach's favorite. Not that hat would be the case with Moe, but it would be a weird dynamic that I'm guessing Cho will seek to avoid unless he really thinks Moe is the player to draft.
BlockParty
06-18-2012, 10:59 PM
I can't imagine they would go through the 2nd round of interviews and not ask the question: Knowing what you know about the draft talent who would you draft at #2....and Why. Cho likes a person that can think (not a knock on the coaches that didn't get the job).
The point is, I would imagine Cho and Dunlap already have similar thoughts, or Dunlap knows that Cho's word carries more weight. It will be interesting in the next few days to figure out how much (if any) time MJ spent with Dunlap leading to this hire.
Potato
06-18-2012, 11:08 PM
He's gonna want a hard worker like MKG
deal wiff it
Up tempo offense with attacking defense.
My mind keeps wandering to MKG.....
If we keep the 2nd pick that is
Potato
06-18-2012, 11:32 PM
Up tempo offense with attacking defense.
My mind keeps wandering to MKG.....
If we keep the 2nd pick that is
Forreal though
gamecocksmitty4
06-18-2012, 11:58 PM
TRob or Drummond for 3 reasons:
1) They both fit team position needs (even though it could easily be argued that every position is a need)
2) They both fit the up-tempo style offense (both bigs who can run the floor and are extremely athletic)
3) Dunlap was hired before their workout on Friday and not before the Beal/MKG workout (as far as I know). If they wanted one of those two then he would have likely been picked before their workout.
SirBobcat
06-19-2012, 12:02 AM
I think he'll identify early that it's clear that the person they select needs to be a self sufficient offensive player. I see MKG and Beal as those kind of guys. They absolutely need to get guys that flat out can create scoring opportunities by themselves. If that's by making a trade, getting that guy, and adding more pieces then wonderful.
SirBobcat
06-19-2012, 12:04 AM
TRob or Drummond for 3 reasons:
3) Dunlap was hired before their workout on Friday and not before the Beal/MKG workout (as far as I know). If they wanted one of those two then he would have likely been picked before their workout.
Devil's Advocate: How do you know that Dunlap wasn't in attendance today? Also, i'm pretty positive they keep video of these workouts...just saying.
gamecocksmitty4
06-19-2012, 12:14 AM
Devil's Advocate: How do you know that Dunlap wasn't in attendance today? Also, i'm pretty positive they keep video of these workouts...just saying.
Both valid points. As for the attendance thing...I'm not sure. That is why I added the "(as far as I know)". As for the video...it's one thing to watch video of someone else's drills. It's completely different to use your own drills and do different things to see exactly what YOU, as the coach, want to see of the players.
SirBobcat
06-19-2012, 12:18 AM
Both valid points. As for the attendance thing...I'm not sure. That is why I added the "(as far as I know)". As for the video...it's one thing to watch video of someone else's drills. It's completely different to use your own drills and do different things to see exactly what YOU, as the coach, want to see of the players.
When you see it...you know it whether it's in person or a video. Besides, next week will reveal more about their intentions.
gamecocksmitty4
06-19-2012, 12:21 AM
Also...take this into account. It is easier, IMO, to become attached to a prospect when you are personally working that player out and interacting with them. Either way, I would be very happy with a combo of TRob and Harkless.
polarcat
06-19-2012, 12:34 AM
I think he'll identify early that it's clear that the person they select needs to be a self sufficient offensive player. I see MKG and Beal as those kind of guys. They absolutely need to get guys that flat out can create scoring opportunities by themselves. If that's by making a trade, getting that guy, and adding more pieces then wonderful.
Agree about Beal, not so much about MKG, however, Harkless is that guy. Robinson, Beal, Lamb, Harkless, and Lillard, IMO.
SirBobcat
06-19-2012, 09:38 AM
Agree about Beal, not so much about MKG, however, Harkless is that guy. Robinson, Beal, Lamb, Harkless, and Lillard, IMO.
I really like Harkless also! Wouldn't pick him 2nd overall, but it's just too bad he won't be around by when we pick next.
CharlotteHornets
06-19-2012, 11:19 PM
If we stay at #2 - Harrison Barnes...shooting, scoring, and athleticism
The Milk
06-20-2012, 12:37 AM
Yep...this ^
polarcat
06-20-2012, 09:07 AM
I really like Harkless also! Wouldn't pick him 2nd overall, but it's just too bad he won't be around by when we pick next.
Totally agree with ya about Harkless at 2 and NOOO way do I take him as my option. Those players I listed were just my opinion on guys in the top-10 that are Dunlap kind of players. I'm still a huge believer in the thought that we can get NO's #10 pick, so that's why Lamb, Harkless, & Lillard are thrown in.
if he is a big x's and o's, teacher of the game guy like he is said, i would not be surprised in the least if they go drummond. or mkg: afterall isn't this who jordan really wants?
superb1
06-20-2012, 10:54 AM
I read that he did not want MKG
I read that he did not want MKG
Really? Do you remember where you read it?
superb1
06-21-2012, 04:05 PM
Really? Do you remember where you read it?
i search for the exact link or article but could not find, but Chad Ford hinted that MJ was not totally sold on MKG
I listed some sources, some not totally reliable,
http://kentuckysportsradio.com/?p=112922
http://www.rufusonfire.com/2012/6/11/3079414/mj-not-sold-on-mkg
http://www.allkyhoops.com/2012/06/michael-jordan-isnt-sold-on-mkg-as-no-2.html
I read it some where else but can't find it.
SJackson1
06-21-2012, 06:52 PM
i think Robinson has the full package and would be a solid pick for us.
westbrook08
06-22-2012, 03:47 AM
I saw today where someone had posted chad ford's latest mock and he said that charlotte was still looking @ possibly moving the pick, but if they kept it, all indications coming out of their camp were that robinson is the guy.And that jordan also liked barnes(trade down option?) and was not very high on mkg.I see robinson,barnes,and drummond probably being our top 3 in that order.And you could make an argument for each i guess.As far as harkless, you have to remember that he was lavin's recruit,not dunlap's. And the fact that moe's first comment about his hiring was about how they were made to do wind sprints if they yawned @ a 6am practice,tells me that he might not have enjoyed playing for him that much.That's just my take.
dnbman
06-22-2012, 05:50 AM
I saw today where someone had posted chad ford's latest mock and he said that charlotte was still looking @ possibly moving the pick, but if they kept it, all indications coming out of their camp were that robinson is the guy.And that jordan also liked barnes(trade down option?) and was not very high on mkg.I see robinson,barnes,and drummond probably being our top 3 in that order.And you could make an argument for each i guess.As far as harkless, you have to remember that he was lavin's recruit,not dunlap's. And the fact that moe's first comment about his hiring was about how they were made to do wind sprints if they yawned @ a 6am practice,tells me that he might not have enjoyed playing for him that much.That's just my take.
I think Moe's next post was that he was a great coach. He was just following up a buddy's tweet about how "intense" coach Dunlap was.
Maurice Harkless @moe_harkless
Dunlap a great coach, better person. Strong passion and is dedicated to the game more than any coach I've had. No doubt he'll be successful
It sounds like a classic case of a tough coach that is liked and respected by his players.
I still don't think we draft Moe unless something crazy happens, certainly not with a high pick.
westbrook08
06-22-2012, 12:10 PM
Ok.I stand corrected.Good find bro!
CharlotteHornets
06-25-2012, 03:52 PM
I no believe it is inevitable that the Bobcats are going to trade the #2 Draft Pick. Most likely to the Cleveland Cavaliers. I have read rumors of the Bobcats traded pick #2 for #4, #24, and #34 from Cleveland. If that turns out to be the deal and taking into account what draft would your prefer? (taking into account Dunlap wanting to improve 3-point shooting)
Scenario #1
#4 - Harrison Barnes - 6'8 SF
#24 - Andrew Nicholson - 6'9 PF
#31 - John Jenkins - 6'4 SG
#34 - Scott Machado - 6'2 PG
Scenario #2
#4 - Thomas Robinson - 6'9 PF
#24 - Festus Ezeli - 6'11 C
#31 - John Jenkins - 6'4 SG
#34 - Darius Miller - 6'7 SF
Scenario #3
#4 - Thomas Robinson - 6'9 PF
#24 - Quincy Miller - 6'10 SF
#31 - Doron Lamb - 6'4 PG/SG
#34 - Miles Plumlee - 6'11 C
Whiz Kid
06-25-2012, 04:00 PM
I'd definitely love Scenario #1. However, I'd take Draymond Green at the #24 pick. Andrew Nicholson is still good though. I guess its a personal preference of mine. If this were to happen all my requests would be answered. lol
cltblkhscoach
06-25-2012, 04:02 PM
Voted for Scenario 1. Even though I am a T-Rob guy, Barnes has grown on me a lot, and that combination of players gives us 2 starters, a sixth man, and a backup PG - all desperate needs for us.
CharlotteHornets
06-25-2012, 04:03 PM
I'd definitely love Scenario #1. However, I'd take Draymond Green at the #24 pick. Andrew Nicholson is still good though. I guess its a personal preference of mine. If this were to happen all my requests would be answered. lol
I thought about putting Draymond Green @24 in that scenario but a 6'9.5" Nicholson w/ a 7'4" wingspan and an excellent jump shot would be too much for me to pass up!
The Prodigy
06-25-2012, 04:05 PM
If we do pick up the Cavs 2nd rounder as well, I think I would rather package both of the 2nd's for another 1st or use one of them in combination with 24 to move up a bit. I dont think we really have room for 4 rookies.
SWedd523
06-25-2012, 04:05 PM
Doesn't really need to be it's own thread, gonna merge it into the Dunlap Draft one.
CharlotteHornets
06-25-2012, 04:06 PM
Voted for Scenario 1. Even though I am a T-Rob guy, Barnes has grown on me a lot, and that combination of players gives us 2 starters, a sixth man, and a backup PG - all desperate needs for us.
I agree with you on that! I believe if D.J. is inevitably on his way out like many believe that Machado would be a huge pickup for the Cats
CharlotteHornets
06-25-2012, 04:06 PM
Doesn't really need to be it's own thread, gonna merge it into the Dunlap Draft one.
SWedd - I did the new thread b/c of the poll...
CharlotteHornets
06-25-2012, 04:09 PM
If we do pick up the Cavs 2nd rounder as well, I think I would rather package both of the 2nd's for another 1st or use one of them in combination with 24 to move up a bit. I dont think we really have room for 4 rookies.
I think we have as much room as we want...We need all the young talent we can possibly get....every one of those players I listed is a significant upgrade to our roster...
Whiz Kid
06-25-2012, 04:10 PM
I thought about putting Draymond Green @24 in that scenario but a 6'9.5" Nicholson w/ a 7'4" wingspan and an excellent jump shot would be too much for me to pass up!
I see. I'm happy with Nicholson but Draymond Green is so versatile so it could go either way.
SWedd523
06-25-2012, 04:20 PM
SWedd - I did the new thread b/c of the poll...
Still got the poll broseph!
spectre
06-25-2012, 04:23 PM
The premise of the thread is well worth discussing but IMO Dunlap will be mostly focused on what he needs in regards to the current roster...which should have absolutely nothing to do with who we pick.
He can definitely have his opinion but that should be all it is.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.