PDA

View Full Version : Big Help = Big Gamble/really Big Gamble



wil
10-18-2008, 08:46 AM
Here it comes......





wait for it.....





EDDY CURRY!!!


http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/rumors/post/Bobcats-Morrison-to-Knicks-for-Curry-Don-t-cou;_ylt=AmeMm1hkXmaMThHySWghhlq8vLYF?urn=nba,1157 28

GoBobs
10-18-2008, 10:02 AM
Currys contract is terrible I might consider this if we got two first round picks in the deal but not otherwise. Plus Brown already knows that Curry sucks so there is no way it is gonna happen.

The only guy I would want from the Knicks would be Nate Robinson.

ammofan
10-18-2008, 10:52 AM
that would be an absolutley terrible trade.

ziggy
10-18-2008, 11:26 AM
The only positive that I can think of from this trade is that the presence of Eddy Curry would actually make Sean May look thin.

SWedd523
10-18-2008, 02:38 PM
We've already seen how LB acts when he's around the Knicks. He lasted what, 30 games, as their coach? I would like to see the LB that made the Sixers and the Pistons great, not the LB that crashed with the Knicks.

Bringing over anyone from that team besides David Lee will do no good for our team as it would result in Larry most likely leaving sooner.

Alex
10-18-2008, 05:59 PM
How about Morrison straight up for Lee



hahhaah

please?

GoBobs
10-18-2008, 06:42 PM
although if they did give us two first round picks to take curry and his contract that would be pretty funny because they have already give up two first round picks to get him on thier team

docend24
10-19-2008, 07:36 AM
No fricking way (you already know why)

BRNC
10-19-2008, 12:10 PM
I don't see Curry as an answer for anything for our team...If we get a legit 4 this year we have to give up a decent player from the current roster...Crash seems to be the only one at this point we can afford to give up...I've seen no interest in him on other forum threads so it looks like we have to live with what we have or get incredibly lucky when teams start cutting rosters but even with cuts I think the best we can hope for is a rotation player. It's just irritating to me that none of the guys on the roster seem willing to step up and take a starting position at the 4 so I'm beginning to feel that none of them are capable... A. Brown and Williams might be better bench players than Davidson and Hollins it still leaves us without a starter...

wil
10-20-2008, 07:56 AM
What IF we could send also NAZR to the knicks together with morrison for Curry??

Plus, to spice it up for the knicks, we send away Ray for Nate robinson to address their pg needs.


That way we won't feel much of the impact of Curry's salary and at the same time we get our first LOW post threat in this franchise.

Worth the risk i think.

C-E. Curry
PF-Okafor
F-Wallace
SG-J-Rich
PG-N.Robinson

davcbow
10-20-2008, 12:04 PM
I dont want any NY players here along with LB, already seen that experiment in NY.... To repeat other posters feelings on the matter... NO...:cool:

Warrior 4 Life85
10-20-2008, 04:42 PM
The only positive that I can think of from this trade is that the presence of Eddy Curry would actually make Sean May look thin.

hahaha well done

docend24
10-21-2008, 10:42 AM
No way (again)

Well, i have more to say this time. If I don't like, correct - If I hate someone from Knicks roster it would be Nate. I don't like him as a person, I don't like his play, i don't like how overhyped he is, simply I don't want this brawler on our roster. I would rather trade all our players for Curry.

And I don't like Curry as a player. He has condition issues but apart from that he doesn't rebound at all. We can't be sure how much Emeka is suited for PF spot, so I would rather address our PF need directly. But if we do such a trade as you supossed I think we would only trade our PF need for C need. And no way Nate would start over DJ.

And I really really doubt Larry would like to have these failing Knicks back. That could cause only negative events.

Marvel
10-21-2008, 05:31 PM
Hell no keep Curry we don't want him