Printable View
I'd have to think moving TT, if we're actually trying to move him, would have more to do with how Paul evaluated him as a player, that and any chemistry issues with the team...his play was better at the start of the season...so it must be something else...or it could be as simple as the FO has decided (for some other reason) he is not a part of our long term plan...but I do find it odd....
Maybe Jordan wasn't the guy who was so hot on Tyrus in the first place...and after the guy who WAS hot on him has moved on maybe Jordan would rather be out from under that long contract?
I question whether Tyrus can continue to "get it" after LB anyway. Those two were pretty tight, and Chicago went thru 3 coaches while they had him and none could get thru to him.
Is Kaman expiring? If not, do not want.
expires next year at 12.2 mil. considering it will probably be 1/2 year, i think i would do it. low risk, decent reward as far as 7 or 8 in the east goes. i would object to extending him which begs the question, why do it in the first place?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Williamson
If we're not going to extend him (and not get a pick) then there is no reason to do it...
i think the tyrus trade wouldnt be good. but the kaman thing im 50-50 on. if he isnt hurt then i say do it, but he isnt old but not young. but would give us that C we need with only losing boris who is more of a point forward in a fat mans body