The man obviously will be a PG in the NBA. He is same type player as DJ, better at scoring than playing point, but can play point. He is clutch shooter and scorer. Would be perfect off the bench is still around at 39.
Printable View
The man obviously will be a PG in the NBA. He is same type player as DJ, better at scoring than playing point, but can play point. He is clutch shooter and scorer. Would be perfect off the bench is still around at 39.
I'd rather take my chances that he goes undrafted, I'm not a huge fan.
Honestly, he's not even my favorite guy from Butler.
from what i have heard of him, i may like the kid from hofstra better. he is more of a gamble even at 39 but a lot of the "experts" like him
Depending on who else has already gone i think he is worth a punt. If there is a useful big around then i would rather take him
kid from Hofstra.. as in Charles Jenkins? Only way he scores is inside 12-15 feet, he also tries to bully players, at 6-3 you cant do that in league.. he is poor version of Ben Gordon pre-jump shot
The only player who shot better than Jenkins in all of the drills during the combine was Goudelock.Quote:
Originally Posted by frontpager
I'd rather take Goudelock, don't like Mack one bit.
Jenkins is a little 2, Mack is same height and plays 1. Ill take Mack at 39 without question. Goudelock is not an NBA player
Why exactly isn't he an NBA player? Because he went to Charleston?
The only thing I don't like about Andrew is his Asts/TO ...but I certainly think he has the tools and skills to stick in the NBA...if he is the best player (or close) when we pick #39 I'd take him...