three lotto picks this year anyone?

trade 1 (copied from dj trades):

3 teamer:

cha out: dj and najera, 2012 2nd
cha in: luke walton and gsw 2012 #1

lakers out: luke walton, derek fisher, better of mavs or lakers 2012 first
lakers in: devin harris, najera

utah out: devin harris, gsw 2012 1st
utah in: dj, derek fisher, better of mavs or lakers 2012 first, bobcats 2012 2nd

trade 2:

cha out: diaw
cha in: jax (next year 10 mil expiring) and mil 1st top 8 protected

both trades are doable from a reality standpoint. if we want extra picks we are going to have to pay for them. and it is not like are cap space is going to go towards impact free agents.

both get the chef blessing. i would be soo pumped to see crazy jax coming back. he would be a riot. he may explode with frustration and anger OR he would be mature about it, play his ass off so he would be traded at draft night or next season as an expiring to a contender.

Both of those trades get the ziggy seal of approval.

I'm willing to do either one of those to get an additional 1st round pick.

If Cho can get those done, even one of them, I'd be happy.

1st trade...I'd rather Blake over Walton...same salary but Blake is over 2 more years vs. the 1 and we could actually use him. Does Fish need to be in the trade to work? If not I'd also just cut out him and Najera.

2nd trade...:hysterical:

Sure I'd do it...but Milwaukee would look about as bad as us if we'd send our pick to move Tyrus. Doubt they would tho as they can just amnesty him if they want.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spectre

1st trade...I'd rather Blake over Walton...same salary but Blake is over 2 more years vs. the 1 and we could actually use him. Does Fish need to be in the trade to work? If not I'd also just cut out him and Najera.

2nd trade...:hysterical:

Sure I'd do it...but Milwaukee would look about as bad as us if we'd send our pick to move Tyrus. Doubt they would tho as they can just amnesty him if they want.

---

has to be one of three of barnes, blake or fisher. blake and barnes are actually useful players for them so i doubt they move them to "make the money work". walton is a zero, fisher is a historic player for them but he was also loved in utah, so it isn't like they would be sending him to siberia...er charlotte. because of tight money, all players had to be in that are in.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spectre

1st trade...I'd rather Blake over Walton...same salary but Blake is over 2 more years vs. the 1 and we could actually use him. Does Fish need to be in the trade to work? If not I'd also just cut out him and Najera.

2nd trade...:hysterical:

Sure I'd do it...but Milwaukee would look about as bad as us if we'd send our pick to move Tyrus. Doubt they would tho as they can just amnesty him if they want.

---

I would do either . But like Spectre i would rather have Blake .
The Bobcat anouncers seem certain Boris is gone . Saying its a big market for a player with his skills ??
Another move building steam is Blatche for TTime , I think i would just rather do the cut..

I bet Captain Jack is not surprised that we want him back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Twan's Kin

I bet Captain Jack is not surprised that we want him back.

---

I want that pick. Jackson is just the cost.