Printable View
Turnover prone comes with being new to NBA speed - and he's still not more turnover prone than Biz or Mullens. Just a bad FT shooting night for everyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Plowright
Don't really know about forcing his own offense... I didn't really see that.
A physical presence we don't have . Smack is our only other inside defender. The pair limit us on offence but would stop so much scoring in the paint.
Less Sessions is the key to winning more games . I have been watching his + - the last 3 weeks . Hes really killing us playing beside Walker. He was the main reason in the 21 point lead lost to the hornrts. And his large - last night in a win should tell us all something. We don't need to be playing 2 points toghter so much . Sorry about getting off topic . Just something i had 2 get off my gut.
Only player on the team last night with a - amd it was a -11 go back look at the trend ' last nights box
http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400278173
I like Sessions a lot but I agree that we're not using him correctly to get the best out of him. In the past he was always good for racking up assists but we've turned him into a scorer. We desperately need it...but it's in all our interests to try and get him back to his strengths.
I'm with DY on all those points and I didn't see any forcing on offense from Adrien either. Hell, with our offensive limitations I kind of hope he would force some.
I looked back on him i think he could hit about 73% of of his ft shooting with regular timeQuote:
Originally Posted by spectre
I'm not on his bandwagon yet. He had a good game against the Bulls; he certainly plays smart, but despite he got to start in this game, he won't make it on any other team's roster. I'll give him some time to prove me wrong. He might surprise me and be better than Mullens, but that doesn't mean anything either.
get him more PT. hopefully he can avg around 8-10 rebs per game and be a decent defender.
then trade him to a team like the spurs for a 1st.
They already have a better version of Adrian in Blair, spurs won't come calling. Also nobody is going to give up a 1 st rounder for him unless he does more than 8-10 rebounds a game
blair is way too short. can't defend at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Plowright
never mind, they are the same height. i am allergic to google. either way, some team will give up something for him if he can get to be a solid bench producer.
He doesn't need to be anything other than a solid, physical rebounder - that's all I wanted. If the team could get rebounds and not be forced into playing small ball out of lack of options, then the guys that we are invested in can grow in a "normal" setting instead of playing Nellie Ball all season long. He doesn't even need to get more than 6 rebounds a game in 20 minutes or so. I think that's all we should expect. Anything else is a bonus.Quote:
Originally Posted by isguros
Our team is horrid inside too. If you can't beat out Mullens, Diop, Biyombo for minutes, then you don't deserve to be in the league as far as I'm concerned.
Blair can't defend because he never has.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chef
Reggie Evans has the same build and he's one of the best defenders in the league. Size isn't really the biggest issue for him.
nobody's giving up any real value for a 6'5" power forward who hasn't stuck with a team in four years. I actually think he can be a useful energy guy off the bench, bur moving him for a pick or prospect if they get a month of competence out of him is a pipe dream.