Gordon for Wallace?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amour217

there's hail in the forecast....

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAIL no

---

LOL :hysterical:

I'm actually a Ben Gordon fan, hes lit the Bobcats up nicely on more than one occasion but if we trade Crash then it has to be for a 4. We need another 2 like a hole in the head.

What happened to wanting a lock down type SG??
Ben Gordan isn't known for his defensive pressure.


Bad deal......

He's one hell of a 6th man though, thats for sure. Too bad we don't need one right now:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael35

I was talking to one of my friends at Chicago and told me that Ben Gordan doesn't want to play for the Bulls and I pitched in the idea of trading Gerald Wallace for him. Would you guys accept?

EDIT: Sorry for putting this in the wrong forum.

---

Even if we did, they wouldn't.

Why would they bring Crash in after just sinking all that coin into Deng when they both play the 3?

(P.S. and I wouldn't from our POV anyway)

No way I'd do the Gordon deal. Salary wise, you just can't have 25 mil in your starting and backup SG's. It would keep us from getting a quality 4 for years to come.

The Boozer deal is still the one that interests me the most. I saw some with Brewer involved and some without. While I would love to get Brewer back, I'd make the deal without him. Getting a low post scorer and rebounder like Boozer would be a best case scenerio. Him be a free agent after the season would cause concern but I would still take a chance on it. I think trading Wallace without getting a top quality 4 in return would probably, long term, be the worst thing the franchise could do.