Welcome to the Bobcatsplanet Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Manchester & (Loughborough Uni) United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,589
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 247 Times in 153 Posts

    Default

    why would you ever even consider Jack being traded for a late 1st? Especially in this draft
    Michael Kidd-Gilchrist
    Kema Walker The Core, The Future...
    Bizmack Biyombo
    Jeffrey Taylor

    Go easy on me, I'm from England, and no... I Don't love the Queen.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Mount Holly, North Carolina, United States
    Posts
    1,596
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 6 Times in 1 Post

    Default

    Thinking about this, Jackson or Diaw + #19 for #4 and #54 (or try to steal away #32?)...(use 54 for toss someone into D-league, or perhaps an international who can play in euroleague for a while). Use #4 for Kanter, #9 for the best available small forward, 39 is high enough to get a marginal talent or perhaps a steal due to injury this summer etc.
    What to do, what to do...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Manchester & (Loughborough Uni) United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,589
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 247 Times in 153 Posts

    Default

    Yer i like it for Diaw, love it actually. I hear Mini are interested in maybe shipping their pick aswell. We could get D will at sf. Maybe try do something with jack or diaw there aswell?
    Michael Kidd-Gilchrist
    Kema Walker The Core, The Future...
    Bizmack Biyombo
    Jeffrey Taylor

    Go easy on me, I'm from England, and no... I Don't love the Queen.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    849
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 14 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    Minnesota has been quoted to say they don't like the #2 pick and are open for a trade where they move down and pick up a veteran at an area of need. If they beleive Jack can play the 2 for them (and he can), then would you do this...

    Jack, #9, #19 for #2 overall?

    I know it is a lot to give up but it might actually be realistic. I would rather give up Jack, #9 and #39 but they probably wouldn't do that.

    Again, would you pull the trigger on Jack, #9, #19 for #2?
    In Cho I Trust!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    9,178
    Thanks
    292
    Thanked 293 Times in 171 Posts

    Default

    I think at the very best we'd get an expiring for Jax. In no way do I see him as an incentive for any team in the lottery to go back in position.

    Boris might get a late 1st and a slightly worse contract.
    Hope Resurrected: "I think I can bring an attitude to a team as far as, All right, no matter what, we are not losing this game'." - Kemba Walker

    "Its okay to be bad; just so long as you're bad ass." - Keetch

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,977
    Thanks
    131
    Thanked 187 Times in 125 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spectre View Post
    I think at the very best we'd get an expiring for Jax. In no way do I see him as an incentive for any team in the lottery to go back in position.

    Boris might get a late 1st and a slightly worse contract.
    agreed. jax will not be moved for much. i think the only way we get a deal with minny is if we give them dj aug. they may do that because they are still looking for a pg to fill in for rubio until he comes over. dj is a risk free way to do that because he is still on his rookie contract and will be able to be extended on the cheap. i would strongly bet dj, 9 and 19 would get consideration but i would hold out for dj and 19. i would settle for dj and 9 for #2 and randolph or beasley.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The Heights ... Uptown
    Posts
    804
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    agreed. jax will not be moved for much. i think the only way we get a deal with minny is if we give them dj aug. they may do that because they are still looking for a pg to fill in for rubio until he comes over. dj is a risk free way to do that because he is still on his rookie contract and will be able to be extended on the cheap. i would strongly bet dj, 9 and 19 would get consideration but i would hold out for dj and 19. i would settle for dj and 9 for #2 and randolph or beasley.
    if we can somehow guarantee that we get reggie jackson out of this draft, then i would be okay with trading dj and #9 to move up to #2 to take williams, and then snag jackson with our 2nd pick. we would be arguably the youngest team in the league, but would definitely be in an okc/pdx kind of position setting us up for the future. i also get the feeling that minny might take kanter at 2, so maybe utah at 3 is where we might also need to discuss trading with.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Jackson Most Likely Out Tonight
    By Proudiddy in forum Bobcats Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-23-2011, 06:59 PM
  2. Jackson to Cleveland for a TPE
    By BIGCatBobcat in forum Bobcats Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 05:01 PM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-23-2011, 03:23 PM
  4. Jackson is a nut case
    By ammofan in forum Bobcats Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-09-2010, 07:40 AM
  5. Cleveland's 'nike' ad
    By BlockParty in forum Around the NBA
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-05-2010, 02:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts