Quote Originally Posted by BrotherDave View Post
Assuming we were stuck with our picks: B for MKG and A- for Taylor. Would have preferred Drummond to MKG and I hate taking wings this high in the draft unless they are "sure fire" studs but whatever. Everybody loved our Ammo draft too. *rolls eyes* Taylor was definitely BPA at 31 and he'll be a solid player most likely.

Assuming we could have traded down for multiples: C-
If there was a smidgen of truth that we could have landed Cleveland's 4 and 24, we should have. Still very likely we would have had MKG as I heard Byron Scott gushing over Dion Waiters but could have also added a big like Arnett Moultrie and we wouldn't be sitting around worrying about what crappy FA big we're about to overpay.
If they would have taken Waiters anyway why would they trade assets to pick him sooner when drafting him at 4th was already a reach?

I didn't like the Ammo draft at all.