The Definitive Trade Ideas Thread

[spectre]

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine/?tradeId=aj53p2r

Henderson/Sessions for Bradley/Bass/BOS 1st.

Don't like Bass' contract at all but I really like Bradley.

[Bogg]

?

He is averaging 3 more points a game than Mully. He is rebounding at literally half the amount that Mully is rebounding. he is older and he gets paid 11 million per year. Charlotte Mully and First Two years Bargs numbers are very very similiar. Mullens can do anything Bargs would do for us and more and make WAY WAY WAY WAY less money doing it. And his potential is on an upward curve where as Bargs if anything is declining. Not a franchise changer, and getting him on the cheap is literally impossible when he makes 10.75 mil per over the next 3 years.


Bargnani better not get anywhere near this team. Its the worst trade imaginable in my opinion.

Bargnani just came off a three-year run of averaging close to 20 a game and is much better at creating his own shot off the dribble than Mullens is. He's arguably a better scorer than Kemba, if you go off of numbers alone. If you can get Bargs on the cheap, with something built around Gordon's contract, he'd go a long way to balancing the teams' scoring issues and filling out the frontcourt in the short-term.

[ohara831]

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine/?tradeId=aj53p2r

Henderson/Sessions for Bradley/Bass/BOS 1st.

Don't like Bass' contract at all but I really like Bradley.

I can see this being something Cho does.

[Mustachio]

Bargnani just came off a three-year run of averaging close to 20 a game and is much better at creating his own shot off the dribble than Mullens is. He's arguably a better scorer than Kemba, if you go off of numbers alone. If you can get Bargs on the cheap, with something built around Gordon's contract, he'd go a long way to balancing the teams' scoring issues and filling out the frontcourt in the short-term.

Again.... you cant get him on the cheap. He's 10 million or more a year for the next 3 years. For a 7 footer who doesnt rebound, and who as of late isn't scoring all that much either.

Its a lateral cap killing move. We don't get any better, sure we might score 3 points a game more but we lose rebounding and any stitch of interior defense we have, and we burn up a shit ton of cap space.

Mullens can do anything Bargnani can do, and do it cheaper. The only thing we accomplish by taking on Bargs is the 10th spot, out side of the playoffs and with a shitty pick and no cap space.

[Bogg]

Again.... you cant get him on the cheap. He's 10 million or more a year for the next 3 years. For a 7 footer who doesnt rebound, and who as of late isn't scoring all that much either.

On the cheap talentwise. Because it's a trade. Talking about Ben Gordon straight up, or throwing in Reggie Williams as well and eating the last year of Linas Kleiza's contract.

Its a lateral cap killing move. We don't get any better, sure we might score 3 points a game more but we lose rebounding and any stitch of interior defense we have, and we burn up a shit ton of cap space.

Bargnani makes less than Ben Gordon this year and next - it doesn't really affect the cap, and Ben isn't doing much in the way of shotblocking or hitting the boards.

Mullens can do anything Bargnani can do, and do it cheaper. The only thing we accomplish by taking on Bargs is the 10th spot, out side of the playoffs and with a shitty pick and no cap space.

"He's worse than the guys already on the team, and his presence will singlehandedly vault us from the worst team in the league to a borderline playoff squad!".......Really?

I hate to be the one to break it to you, but nobody's taking Charlotte from worst to a tie with Philly over the next two months. I mean, you can't argue that he's no better than who's on the roster and then say that he's going to take a fifteen-win team and make them a thirty-five-win team. To say nothing of the fact that it doesn't affect cap space, because the contracts have to match and Gordon has an additional year left on his deal.

[mrtarheel]

I can see sending Sessions to Boston maybe trying to add TT with him for Courtney Lee and Bass. This sheds them some long term money as both are signed up for 4 yrs. Then we flip Hendo and Williams for Maynor, Lamb, and PJIII. Brooklyn will come around and take Gordon for Hump and we will have change the outlook of the team will remaining competitive.

[Bogg]

I can see sending Sessions to Boston maybe trying to add TT with him for Courtney Lee and Bass. This sheds them some long term money as both are signed up for 4 yrs. Then we flip Hendo and Williams for Maynor, Lamb, and PJIII. Brooklyn will come around and take Gordon for Hump and we will have change the outlook of the team will remaining competitive.

Boston isn't looking to shed money. They're looking to upgrade their bench with a fourth guard and a rotation big. IF they were looking to shed money, they hang up on that offer.

[Aircat]

So a new trade proposal;

Knicks get Gordon and Thomas
Cats get Stoudamire and NY 2013 first rounder (spot 24).

Do u think thats reasonable? Cats would take on about 12 million. With the 24 spot one could draft a big like Withey - best case scenario - or a Guard someone like Hardaway Jr., Crabbe, or Schroeder...

Is this a feasible trade for both teams?

i know STAT got broke knees, but his leadership could support the culture change of the franchise...

[Aircat]

So a new trade proposal;

Knicks get Gordon and Thomas
Cats get Stoudamire and NY 2013 first rounder (spot 24).

Do u think thats reasonable? Cats would take on about 12 million. With the 24 spot one could draft a big like Withey - best case scenario - or a Guard someone like Hardaway Jr., Crabbe, or Schroeder...

Is this a feasible trade for both teams?

i know STAT got broke knees, but his leadership could support the culture change of the franchise...

[spectre]

Unlike the DET pick I don't think 24th is worth the extra salary. I also think Stoudamire would be a detriment to the locker room.