The post that started this whole argument was me saying that for Kemba to become an elite player he'll have to improve his passing. Without being a 25-ish point per game scorer, he's going to have to be able to run an offense at least comparable to Steve Nash or Rondo to be among the best of the best. That's the "criticism" I leveled at Kemba that some find objectionable. Other than that, I've been arguing that if a guy plays 30-plus minutes a night either way, "starter" is a meaningless distinction that people get hung up on. This is objectionable, apparently.