I didnt feel that kemba was ready for the nba ,but he have changed my mind. i was certainly a kemba critic because of his sg mentality but kemba really have been productive this year and efficient .
yes russell and kemba are shoot first pg's ,but i feel kemba is more natural and lets the game come to him , while russell clearly wants to be the alpha dog and forces the game. kemba has good court vision and doesn't force turnovers, while russell court vision sucks and forces alot of to's .
our losing has nothing to do with kemba, it has more to do with that we only have like 6 quality/good nba players(kemba,hendo,sessions,mkg,gordon,and haywood) on our roster. im sorry but biz is still a prospect, mully doesnt know what position he is and taylor is a bench payer ,and these players are getting the bulk of the mins.
i truly feel kemba(of course he needs talent around him) can lead us to becoming title contenders because chauncey wasnt a pass first pg, tony parker's a scorer, mike bibby (sac days),and of course allen iverson lead their teams to elite status.for years i've been telling people that you dont need a team full of superstars to become champions .you can build a title team around your star player without pairing him with a superstar because i feel stars clash and their games cant adjust with others; examples knicks(amare&melo),nets(deron,jj) lakers(kobe,nash,and howard). the heat are an exception because lebron game can an adapt to any situation, and the thunder are an exception but i do feel that if they would of had a simple pg like andre miller or jason kidd they could of won because russell needs his own team(better off trading russell instead of harden).



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks