Is Cho Considering Biz A Roast Gone Bad?

[mrtarheel]

Don't like any of those trades if anything we need Thompson.

[Scottley Crue]

I think the better way to get it back is to take on Boozer. Everyone knows how cheap that ownership group is (profit in the tops of the NBA but never over the LT) so you'd have to think they'd give up an asset vs. amnestying him.

And we could use him.

I've been curious as to what they intend to do with Boozer, too. He'd look to be an amnesty candidate, but with them being so "frugal", I wonder if they'd actually pay Boozer to not be there and pay another guy to take his place. Especially after paying Gibson this summer.

The way Boozer is playing I'd like to have him here. He'd be a much-needed vet who can help on and off the floor, kind of like Sessions does right now. If we get our pick back and Boozer to boot, it wouldn't be such a bad haul, I believe (depending on who is send out, of course).

[Fred Williamson]

Boozer? aww, hell naww

Bulls fans are willing to trade him for a bag of peanuts and a soda, just to demonstrate you how bad he is this year.

[Plowright]

Actually he's been averaging 20-11 for a couple of weeks/ month now, it's been the best he has played for the Bulls since signing

[Black]

Actually he's been averaging 20-11 for a couple of weeks/ month now, it's been the best he has played for the Bulls since signing

True, but the general consensus among Bulls fans is that he should be traded while he's playing like this, because it isn't going to last.

[Plowright]

I agree, I'm just saying his value is at it's highest now so might be stupid to trade for him, wait for this span to go and do it then when his value is down. Hopefully before the trade deadline.... That's if we are trading for him

[Black]

I agree, I'm just saying his value is at it's highest now so might be stupid to trade for him, wait for this span to go and do it then when his value is down. Hopefully before the trade deadline.... That's if we are trading for him

Yeah, I'm not interested at all. Adding him this year serves no purpose besides hurting our draft position. Maybe next year, if we're actually competitive and his contract isn't quite as daunting. Not to mention we could get him at a discount if the Bulls decide to amnesty him.

[Proudiddy]

none of that made sense

bulls need henderson more than sacramento does. we don't need rip. our pick to chicago won't even be in danger for another 2 years - even if it is, we're buffed by detroit's pick. jason thompson was worth talking about three years ago. i do like jimmer... sorta.

there has to be another player from one of those two teams coming here aside from just jimmer or jason thompson

I was thinking that... Why wouldn't we just trade Hendo to CHI They've been hurting at SG for years... None of those rumors really made any sense at all.

[DY_nasty]

True, but the general consensus among Bulls fans is that he should be traded while he's playing like this, because it isn't going to last.

It was last year.

Boozer has been playing great this year though. I don't think people pay attention to Bulls games though.

[yasuhara2241]

I agree that these trade scenarios don't make much sense without looking at possibly the entire picture.

Why would we be so interested in obtaining the Tyrus pick? Well that would enable us to flip our top pick this next year for a proven player. I know this is a lot of what ifs and conjecture but so are all rumors.

The idea might be trade Hendo (who possibly we won't or dont want to resign) and portlands pick and we get back our pick.
We then trade our 2013 pick and other pieces for a proven player. This way we get out of the "bad draft" and get a proven player who they see as a lot better than two picks in the 2013 draft. Just a thought!