Welcome to the Bobcatsplanet Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    569
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 101 Times in 88 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DashGlobal View Post
    We dont have to go small ball. All we need to do is run the offense through the wings. Only job for the bigs should be to rebound and defend the paint.
    That doesn't work well when none of the bigs can reliably hit a jumpshot and Kidd-Gilchrist is on the floor with his broken jumper. If only two of your players area a threat to hit from outside fifteen feet it's remarkably easy for the defense to pack the paint and make you take bad shots.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    426
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 427 Times in 142 Posts

    Default Who's sick of the 3-4 guard lineups and "search" for the right combination??

    Quote Originally Posted by DashGlobal View Post
    We dont have to go small ball. All we need to do is run the offense through the wings. Only job for the bigs should be to rebound and defend the paint.
    Small ball doesn't mean point guards only. It means utilizing anyone to attack from the perimeter, wings included, and not with big guys on the inside.

    Outside-in offense doesn't solve our issues, regardless of the size of the attacker. We need bigs.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,001
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 92 Times in 80 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bogg View Post
    That doesn't work well when none of the bigs can reliably hit a jumpshot and Kidd-Gilchrist is on the floor with his broken jumper. If only two of your players area a threat to hit from outside fifteen feet it's remarkably easy for the defense to pack the paint and make you take bad shots.
    True, which is why we shouldnt draft a wing player that doesnt at least have a respectable jumpshot. Id play MKG at the 4 when facing a team with a more finesse PF and have kemba, gordon, taylor, and sessions on the wings.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,001
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 92 Times in 80 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QC Thundercats View Post
    Small ball doesn't mean point guards only. It means utilizing anyone to attack from the perimeter, wings included, and not with big guys on the inside.

    Outside-in offense doesn't solve our issues, regardless of the size of the attacker. We need bigs.
    That is what im talking about. Attacking from the perimeter. Our bigs are complete trash. Have to be the worst in the league.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    569
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 101 Times in 88 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DashGlobal View Post
    True, which is why we shouldnt draft a wing player that doesnt at least have a respectable jumpshot. Id play MKG at the 4 when facing a team with a more finesse PF and have kemba, gordon, taylor, and sessions on the wings.
    Speaking strictly about next season and beyond, you can get away with it just fine if your power forward has a good jumper. It's a big reason why you can't play any hustle/energy/defense guys (Hickson, Hansbrough, Noel, etc) long minutes in the starting lineup if you intend to keep Biz and MKG around as building blocks.


 

Similar Threads

  1. "Go for the Playoffs? Playoffs?!" or "Patience is a Virtue"
    By QC Thundercats in forum Bobcats Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-21-2012, 11:40 AM
  2. Did Bobcats drop the ball on "drafting BPA" and "collecting assets"?
    By Veteran_Picksetter in forum NBA Draft Talk
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 07-01-2012, 08:54 PM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-08-2012, 10:34 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-18-2011, 06:23 PM
  5. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-13-2008, 10:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts