Apology accepted. I stand by it however. Most of the lottery picks are going to be picked based on potential and not how the currently play (like most years). From what I've seen from guys projected high in the upcoming draft, I don't see a finished enough product that makes them NBA starter material from day one.
I'm interested in knowing who you think is going to be enough of an impact player coming out that could match up with established NBA starters at their respective position.
"The owners are fighting for a system that will help save them from bad general managers and poor basketball decisions." --Kurt Helin via spectre
"The owners are fighting for a system that will help save them from bad general managers and poor basketball decisions." --Kurt Helin via spectre
Kemba, McLemore, MKG,__________, Biyombo. I think if we get McLemore in the draft we need to trade/sign a power forward, someone like Milsap/Horford
My Article - 'A Light At The End Of The Tunnel' - http://sportsclt.com/2013/04/05/a-li...of-the-tunnel/
NBA Playoff Picks- http://www.youngsportspicks.com/Purchase_Picks.html
You're probably right about the first...they sure look it...definitely better offensively. Totally agree on your second statement.
My argument is that while a handful of rookies drafted this year will start on their team next year (and ours will and am I glad for it) I don't think any of them are starter material, per se, from the get go.
I hope that makes sense...in my mind it does but I dunno.
"The owners are fighting for a system that will help save them from bad general managers and poor basketball decisions." --Kurt Helin via spectre
Lol @Beagle I was mean last night sorry I sounded mean![]()
John Wall & C.J. Leslie
i don't think mclemore or bazz are better than MKG....in the 2012 draft they would not have gone as high as MKG did or was projected to
ok but im talking in the contexts of the 2012 draft would either of them have gone as high as MKG went? no
Bookmarks