Welcome to the Bobcatsplanet Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,995
    Thanks
    137
    Thanked 190 Times in 128 Posts

    Default Lebron is doing pretty special things

    espn is probably already lining up the talking heads to decide if he is the GOAT. i can't stand espn. anyway,

    debate:

    what would jordan's stats look like playing in todays nba vs the late 80's-90's nba?

    what would lebron's stats and game look like playing in jordan's era?

    i know what i suspect would happen, but i like to read other peeps opinions.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    7,601
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 564 Times in 346 Posts

    Default

    My opinion is pretty simple


    Put LeBron in Jordan era: Jordan Better
    Put Jordan in LeBron era: Jordan Better




    Jordan is the GOAT, nothing I've seen from anybody other than maybe Shaq in 2000 can approach MJ's prime, LeBron included. When all is said and done, LeBron will be a top 10 all time player, but MJ is on a pedestal by himself... and rightfully so


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Huntersville, NC
    Posts
    9,666
    Thanks
    286
    Thanked 252 Times in 126 Posts

    Default

    If you put Lebron in Jordan's era, I don't think I could put him ahead of Jordan, but I think he would clearly be the #2 player in the league. His body/skillset combination is too ridiculous to drop any lower than that.

    Putting MJ in today's era, hmmm... I would say MJ and Lebron would be a dead heat. I think salary cap issues, luxury taxes etc would have prevented the Bulls from maintaining their elite talent level for 6 out of 8 years ( Same for the Magic era Lakers and Bird era Celtics ). Without the supporting cast, if he wins 3 rings instead of 6 then his legacy isn't the same.

    Also the Jordan of this era wouldn't have the enormous athleticism advantage that he has over many of today's athletes. Don't get me wrong, he would still be elite athletically but there would probably be 10 guys on his athletic level today whereas in his era there was 1 or 2 maybe.
    Help Feed the Server at No Cost to you Find out how ----> HERE

    Follow BCP on Twitter


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    7,601
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 564 Times in 346 Posts

    Default

    Hakeem, Shaq, The Admiral, Karl Malone, Dominique, Larry Nance, James Worthy, Julius Erving, Clyde Drexler, Charles Barkley, etc.



    Jordan played with plenty of guys who would be elite athletes in any era. Not to mention he wouldn't have to deal with the hand check in today's game and would get even more superstar calls. If he wanted to, he'd easily be able to average 40/8/8 in today's game. Hell, he went for 33/8/8 on 56% shooting one year back in the day.

    He has a career average of 30.1 (which includes two years in Washington when he was well past his prime). LeBron has never averaged that number for a single year. LeBron's single highest rebounding and assist averages are 8.1 and 8.6 while Michael's are 8 and 8.


    More scoring, better defense, better leader, better winner. LeBron is a sensational player, so don't get me wrong. But he's no Michael Jordan


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,995
    Thanks
    137
    Thanked 190 Times in 128 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SWedd523 View Post

    He has a career average of 30.1 (which includes two years in Washington when he was well past his prime). LeBron has never averaged that number for a single year. LeBron's single highest rebounding and assist averages are 8.1 and 8.6 while Michael's are 8 and 8.


    More scoring, better defense, better leader, better winner. LeBron is a sensational player, so don't get me wrong. But he's no Michael Jordan
    this is the single biggest reason why the GOAT argument is pretty lame in my opinion. lebron could avg 30/10/7-10 if he really wanted to. he doesn't. he isn't driven the same way mj is/was. however, talent wise i think it is closer than alot of folks in the 'mj will never be touched camp' think.

    i like the cross era comps alot though. it is a much more enjoyable debate.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Chef For This Useful Post:

    isguros (02-13-2013)

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    973
    Thanks
    1,140
    Thanked 54 Times in 48 Posts

    Default

    bismack biyombo
    John Wall, C.J. Leslie, & Quincy Miller

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Davidson County, NC
    Posts
    2,785
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked 122 Times in 78 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chef View Post
    this is the single biggest reason why the GOAT argument is pretty lame in my opinion. lebron could avg 30/10/7-10 if he really wanted to. he doesn't. he isn't driven the same way mj is/was. however, talent wise i think it is closer than alot of folks in the 'mj will never be touched camp' think.

    i like the cross era comps alot though. it is a much more enjoyable debate.
    That's the reason for the GOAT label for MJ and why Lebron can't/won't touch MJ. He isn't driven to be the best so how can he top the best?

    Swedd is right about the level of competition in the MJ era as well as the hand check rules. Lebron is obviously a physical specimen unlike any other seen in the NBA and hand checking would only do so much but it would slow him down a tad...and guys like Dream, Ewing, and hell even Laimbeer and Rodman patrolling the lane, I can't see LBJ being as effective in the post as he is in this era (but thank god he has finally woke up and realized what an advantage he has in the post instead of on the perimeter).

    Ulitmately, my thoughts are:

    MJ would dominate in this era as in any era.

    LBJ would be sensational in the MJ era seeing maybe a slight dip in points, same number of assists, but I see probably a couple less boards a game or more since boxing out was the norm back in the day, plus, the size of players and physical play.
    "The owners are fighting for a system that will help save them from bad general managers and poor basketball decisions." --Kurt Helin via spectre

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    529
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 68 Times in 58 Posts

    Default Lebron is doing pretty special things

    Quote Originally Posted by CorbKicks8 View Post
    LeBron is the most hated athlete ever (maybe) for the most stupid reasons. Dunno why people don't like Bron. If anything people shouldn't like Kobe for all those allegations and nonsense that went on when Shaqaclaus was in LA
    They hate him because he's just too damn good! At the end of his career he'll be known as co-goat.

    "I'LL KILL YOU MOTHER &*%$^@!!!"
    - Tyrus Thomas

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to isguros For This Useful Post:

    CampNightmare8 (02-17-2013)

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,245
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 180 Times in 105 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by isguros View Post
    They hate him because he's just too damn good! At the end of his career he'll be known as co-goat.
    Nobody hates Lebron because of his abilities. I think most people that criticize him point to a relative lack of leadership on the court and then the Cleveland debacle where he basically publicly humiliated a whole city.

    That being said, I've never seen a player destroy teams like Michael. Yes, he had a good supporting cast, but they weren't anything special compared to the supporting cast of the top teams of today, other than the fact that they all knew their jobs and played them well. But Michael would rip people's hearts out. I don't think people are afraid of Lebron like they were of Jordan.

    That's not saying that Lebron can't easily take over a game. (The Pistons playoff game in one of his early playoff pushes was one of the greatest single game performances I've ever seen.) That's not saying he isn't one of the greatest players of all time. However, I just don't see in him what I saw in Jordan. Kobe is the closest, but he whines a bit too much. Jordan would just remember and then murder you next time.

    Other than Tiger in his prime, I've never seen a single player dominate like Michael. (Though Gretzky certainly comes to mind, I never really had the pleasure of watching him play.)
    SOMEONE will pay for THIS!

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,056
    Thanks
    162
    Thanked 275 Times in 135 Posts

    Default

    Head game.


    If Lebron played back then he wouldn't have been as great I don't think. I don't hate Lebron (I dont like him) and its easy to be nostalgic about the past and how tough it was. But I think it took a special kind of killer to be great then, and Lebron aint got that. Lebron is special and today when he gets two steps ... its over. But back then even if he had the full court to run there would have been a hard foul to contest his run. Its just difficult to judge two different eras.

    The thing about MJ... he didn't change basketball he changed sports and possibly culture. Lebron is just a physical freak of nature playing basketball he isn't changing anything.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Pretty horrible trade I could see happening because we suck
    By Livingston's Fro in forum Trade Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-03-2012, 01:35 PM
  2. Pretty fair take on the Bobcat's season
    By dnbman in forum Bobcats Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-23-2012, 04:30 PM
  3. Pretty close to the worst draft we could have
    By dnbman in forum NBA Draft Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-28-2011, 04:35 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 03:27 PM
  5. Some pretty good news...
    By teej in forum Bobcats Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-21-2009, 10:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts