There is no justification. It was not righteous!
This is something that has been eating at me since last night, where i nearly broke down and cried when I saw what Sam Vincent planned to do. Raymond became our go to guy with three seconds left. Remember the game back against houston, gerald was our go to guy then.
Heres the important part. Both times didnt work. Now Raymond hit that 3 to push the cavs into ot. But he missed a shot to give us the win in that game too. Ray missed a freethrow that would have tied the game. Sorry but I love ray's driving ability, but seriously what the hell is sam vincent thinking.
Who is a proven end of the game guy on our team? JASON RICHARDSON
Lets see he only grabbed a rebound as a guard, flew down court, and hit a three to win the game against the Mavs in the PLAYOFFS. He hit everything he shot when we were making our 4th quarter push, even banked an off balance three (but it didnt count). He missed in OT after being fouled and the ball was partially blocked. We pay him the most, he is the best pure scorer on the bobcats so Sam why the hell arent we going to him?
Also that inbounds play involved three guys standing in a line while ray ran around them. WHAT? Seriously, we are looking for ANY, ANY shot that is open and we can hit. Instead we limited our options to one, decent finisher with the rest of our guys clogged up and not open.
Please help me find some justification for why we ran that shitty play for ray and didnt look for jrich to win the game?
Fire Sam Vincent
There is no justification. It was not righteous!
I think Vincent likes his point gurads! He is crazy....
dieboltdesigns.com
I didn't watch the game, so this is no comment on the play.
However, when it comes to a go to guy, Richardson is great but often has significant troubles at the line.
Felton, meanwhile, has hit a bunch of big shots and is usually money at the line at the end of games.
So, in pure terms, I'd feel good but with slight reservation about both guys. However, I wouldn't second guess Vince for designing a play for Felton. However, I would second the actual play he designs, as well as 98% of all decisions he makes, including where he parks, what he eats for lunch and the kind of pen he chooses.
Suffice to say, I don't have a lot of faith in ANY of his decisions.
SOMEONE will pay for THIS!
I didn't catch the end of the game either but I have quick question did the Kings double team Richardson in the final minutes of OT and we just couldn't get the ball to him? I mean dude did have 29 points...which might explain Felton being the one taking the game in his hands.
RIP Michael Jackson & Steve McNair
nope. and more importantly the play at the end of the game was designed purely for only 1 player, if your going to design it for one, design it for Jason imo, but really it should have been a spread floor for lots of options
Ham Biscuit's logic - lose bad enough and we won't need a go to man....![]()
......Go Bobcats!!!!! !!!..
Oh ok but yea I agree with you J-Rich should be the bail out guy for us that's why we brought him to Charlotte.Originally Posted by MattD
RIP Michael Jackson & Steve McNair
At this rate, our go-to guy at the end of games is Sam Vincent...we blame him for every loss
That last play happend down at the end of the court where I sat up behind the Kings bench. Raymond was definitely not the first option; Jeff was grimacing that he had no other option than to give it to Raymond in the corner with his back to the basket no less. Too busy watching Jeff to see where he was going to throw it, but he was looking top of the key at first, probably for JRich, though I'm not sure, but a screen must have missed, and Raymond was forced to come to the ball.
That said, Vincent has no clue about late game strategy. You gotta be kidding me that you can't do a stagger screen or something to get JRich the ball. Seriously, the Kings are good at getting steals, but not that good at ball denial that a well planned screen or two couldn't have gotten him open.
"The owners are fighting for a system that will help save them from bad general managers and poor basketball decisions." --Kurt Helin via spectre
Bookmarks