To put an end to this "brick wall" conversation that we're having, I'll concede to you and genuflect in your genius and obviously-unerring foresight. In total humility to your superior argumentative skills, I have only this to say:Originally Posted by Big Slam
You are basing your opinions about a college PG on how he has performed in college.
This college PG has not completed a full season yet, and controls a mediocre team.
You are stating that he is superior in terms of poise and control to a PG who excelled in college and has basically started every game of his nearly 3 year career.
I have given irrefutable evidence that Raymond possesses poise and control at the highest level in college.
Therefore it's illogical to indicate that a the college PG is superior to Raymond in terms of poise in control, when Raymond has excelled in the NCAAs, whereas the college PG hasn't even played in an NCAA tournament game, much less an NBA game.
The only gripe I had with what you initially said was that this Bayless character "has more poise and plays under control better than Felts," which, given the argument I've put forth in the above, makes no sense. Will Bayless be a better PG in the NBA than Raymond? I don't have a clue. Maybe. Probably. I just know that, at this stage of his career, I haven't seen any evidence of his poise and/or control being superior to Raymond.