Reply With QuoteI'd have the team doctor's check Brand out. If they cleared him, he'd be my choice over Boozer in a heartbeat. Brand is tough, and I saw Boozer "disappear" too many times vs the Lakers. Brand is by far a better PF.
Brand or Boozer?
Discuss... Who would be better for us and which would be easier to bring in? I would think Brand is the better player but how serious is the injury? What would it take to get him? Etc. I think either could be a positive beside Okafor but it really depends on what we have to give up to get either player...
I'd have the team doctor's check Brand out. If they cleared him, he'd be my choice over Boozer in a heartbeat. Brand is tough, and I saw Boozer "disappear" too many times vs the Lakers. Brand is by far a better PF.
either way we are improving our team drastically. Brand is a little older, but id say hes a little more talented as well.
but id take either of em
Brand.
He is better by the fact that he plays D.
I'd actually take Boozer.
Brand may or may not return to peak form. Meanwhile, Boozer is looking more and more like Karl Malone. He'd open things up for Okafor and give us a guaranteed offensive presence inside for years.
SOMEONE will pay for THIS!
Boozer would come at a cheaper price and he would also come with another young player while Brand comes alone with a high price.
Bingo. Brand would cost a LOT.Originally Posted by mrtarheel
Rather have him tho...pretty easily.
To be honest, I would take whichever one we could get. Either one would automatically makes us a better team. Brands injury scares me a little bit, but if he's cleared by doctors then I'd give Brand the slight edge over Boozer.
Boozer Boozer Boozer. Great player, great motor as Bilas would say. Brand scares me, big time. I wouldnt want that many leg injuries on our team if James Andrews was the team doctor. And he is really, really good but I just dont like him.
Neither would ever be traded here because they're both Dukies.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks