UGH... Augustin just makes NO sense for us..... VOMIT...
Has us picking Augustin at 9 but BAYLESS dropping to 12!!!!!
Also has us picking Koufos at 20 with Hibbert goin to the champs at 30.
If I can get Bayless at 9, I make no trades.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...x.html?eref=T1
Last edited by kickazzz2000; 06-26-2008 at 01:15 AM. Reason: edited because my drunk ass forgot to add the link
UGH... Augustin just makes NO sense for us..... VOMIT...
I like the Kosta Koufos pick. But not the DJ Augustine pick. If we wanted an undersized point, who was good at running the team, good FT and passer, we should have kept BK.
Guess I'd go with Bayless if it falls like that.
I love Bayless. I just dont understand all this talk of Hibbert as the Center so Okafor can play PF. He cant play the PF. Koufos has some range, so I'd rather draft Koufos with #20 and play him at the PF with Okafor at Center. But I dont know if Koufos will make it to #20.
What kills me about Augustine is that when you read his draft profiles and compare them to Felton's, they're virtually the same, with Augustine considered a better shooter and Felton a better ball handler. Both were considered somewhat short, extremely fast, and good playmakers, running their respective teams very effectively.
Interesting, the knock on Augustine is that he tended to look for his own shot too much in the first half of this past season, but became better about it as the season moved on.
Basically, I don't see picking a pg at 9 unless that guy is a versatile guard who can be a great scoring guard too. (think Bayless) I also wouldn't mind an athletic defender who can provide athleticism at both spots (think Westbrook). What I don't want is undersized pg who duplicates what we already have. I really hope we don't take Augustine unless it involves trading down and acquiring some other asset.
As for 20, I'd prefer a PF/C who can play both positions, but I'll be happy for a strong young C.
SOMEONE will pay for THIS!
Augustin is a stud - but I don't know if I would take him at #9. If there is nothing more attractive there, I would take him though and run.
If he was around at 20, I wouldn't feel about taking him at all. But reaching on a pg that probably won't be any more effective than the one we already have at 9 just doesn't make sense, especially since he has been criticized for doing the very things that Felton is criticized for. Both were playmaker studs in college.
SOMEONE will pay for THIS!
DJ has better point instincts than Felts does.
It just sucks that DJ is small.
Bookmarks