Gordon for Wallace?

[TheLegend]

I was talking to one of my friends at Chicago and told me that Ben Gordan doesn't want to play for the Bulls and I pitched in the idea of trading Gerald Wallace for him. Would you guys accept?

EDIT: Sorry for putting this in the wrong forum.

[ammofan]

how about Ben and Joakim for Gerald and a 2nd rounder?

[dnbman]

I don't want to trade Wallace unless we get a quality PF in return. Obviously, there are exceptions (Bryant, Lebron), but those are hardly realistic.

[jpf_v2.0]

Gotta agree with dnb on this one.

[SWedd523]

Why would we trade our best player and starting SF for an undersized non defensive scoring 2? We already have Richardson so why downgrade

[Alex]

that trade would make no sense for us whatsoever.

[Slam]

I was talking to one of my friends at Chicago and told me that Ben Gordan doesn't want to play for the Bulls and I pitched in the idea of trading Gerald Wallace for him. Would you guys accept?

EDIT: Sorry for putting this in the wrong forum.

Even if we did, they wouldn't.

Why would they bring Crash in after just sinking all that coin into Deng when they both play the 3?

(P.S. and I wouldn't from our POV anyway)

[WAM9]

No way I'd do the Gordon deal. Salary wise, you just can't have 25 mil in your starting and backup SG's. It would keep us from getting a quality 4 for years to come.

The Boozer deal is still the one that interests me the most. I saw some with Brewer involved and some without. While I would love to get Brewer back, I'd make the deal without him. Getting a low post scorer and rebounder like Boozer would be a best case scenerio. Him be a free agent after the season would cause concern but I would still take a chance on it. I think trading Wallace without getting a top quality 4 in return would probably, long term, be the worst thing the franchise could do.