yeah theyre a dime a dozen right... its a bit more complicated then lets do it.
plus, no, I would rather have an inside outside pf and keep mek at center.
I SUGGEST instead of failing to acquired stud PF why the management focus to get Mobile Center to pair with EO50 it improves the ceiling of the team my list is vet paul, okur, brad miller, mark blount and young spencer hawes, biedrins, and bargani.
do you buy my idea??
yeah theyre a dime a dozen right... its a bit more complicated then lets do it.
plus, no, I would rather have an inside outside pf and keep mek at center.
Okafor is clearly better at the 5 spot and actually struggles guarding athletic 4's on the perimeter. Adding a guy like Miller, Okur or Blount wouldn't be the best pairing for Emeka. That would give us 2 big guys (actually 3 if you count Nazr) who struggle to guard perimeter players.
Also, who do you suggest we give up to acquire one of these guys you bring up? I like our core right now and even like the deep bench...I'm not looking to sell off any of our young players right now...
Bargnani!!!!!!!
dieboltdesigns.com
nope i see okur, miller and mark can chase mobile PF like Duncan, Amare, Garnett .
eo50 will play inside the rim while the mobile center chase mobile PF...
If we can be patient enough, hopefully either Davidson or Ajinca will fill that mobile big man with range role that we are lacking.
Nope...I don't think anyone would consider Okur, Miller or Blount as mobile centers that are athletic enough to guard the opposing teams athletic 4's.
Watching any of those 3 try to guard a guy like Garnett or Dirk would be sad.
I actually like all 3 of those guys but they do not fit our situation at all. Again, who would you propose we give up to acquire these players?
Bookmarks