Welcome to the Bobcatsplanet Forum.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Matthews, NC
    Posts
    103
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    That would be great if we could Crittenton and Warrick for Carroll. Doubt they would do that though. I would consider Morrison for Crittenton and Warrick. Crittenton like 6'5" and he plays pretty good D if i remember right. He could gaurd both sg and pg.

  2. #12
    coordinator0 is offline Shawn "My knee is fine now, Thank you very much" Livingston
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    264
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Slam View Post
    Hammer
    for
    Warrick and Jarvis works too

    and is something I would be much more comfortable with.
    I don't think I would have to give a thought before I'd do that deal.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Matthews, NC
    Posts
    103
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Slam View Post
    Hammer
    for
    Warrick and Jarvis works too

    and is something I would be much more comfortable with.
    That would be my first option i would want to do. But Warrick is playing big minutes so i think they would only take Morrison and not Carroll. But do this trade first then the memphis trade. all trades work

    Felton and May to Portland for Frye and Webster

    then trade Morrison to Memphis for Warrick and Crittenton

    we get a pf/c to pair with mek for Felton who we probably wont resign and throw in may to make the $ work and he's off portlands books at the end of this year. we get Webster to make up for Morrison's shooting loss and get a very solid bench player in Warrick and a big guard in Crittenton. we improve in all areas with these two trades and we still have J-rich and Crash at the end of it. and all of these trades are realistic to happen. thoughts?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,605
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    He reminds me of McMay but waaaaay more athletic

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Wilmington, NC
    Posts
    639
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    having him on my fantasy team last year i can tell you, no i don't want him here

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Hakim Warrick wasn't one and done at Syracuse, he played all 4 years. I wouldn't mind him here doing a little of this ...

  7. #17
    coordinator0 is offline Shawn "My knee is fine now, Thank you very much" Livingston
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    264
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick161 View Post
    Hakim Warrick wasn't one and done at Syracuse, he played all 4 years. I wouldn't mind him here doing a little of this ...
    I understand why they call him the Helicoptor now. What a terrible nickname.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Blowing Rock, NC
    Posts
    3,395
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick161 View Post
    Hakim Warrick wasn't one and done at Syracuse, he played all 4 years. I wouldn't mind him here doing a little of this ...
    You're absolutely correct...I had heard about him in "05 (which turned out to be his senior year when I checked)...I've only glimpsed him play while in the NBA and have no idea what kinda of college player he was...I know he was Big East first team his last two years (knew about one)...the few times I've seen him in the NBA have been short but I got the impression he liked to dunk and he appears very athletic...I'm not sure (until this year with Memphis ) he's ever gotten much playing time...

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,605
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I would rather have Arthur than Hak,there's a reason a rookie is in the starting lineup over a vet

  10. #20
    coordinator0 is offline Shawn "My knee is fine now, Thank you very much" Livingston
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    264
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marvel View Post
    I would rather have Arthur than Hak,there's a reason a rookie is in the starting lineup over a vet
    So would I, but teams rarely deal rookies mid-season. The last time that I remember anybody dealing a person after their rookie season was TOR when the sent Villanueva to MIL for Ford. Anybody have any others?


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts