Boards and turnovers

[dav7z]

Does the 26th take pace into account?

That's why I think "per 100 possessions" would mean more.

I agree pace should factor some but should not by any means should be the key factor in addressing our teams lack of rebounding. Brown is addressing this as a key factor . Then i assume its a problem.

If we look at where we can inprove
Diop is a disapointment for his size
Nazz is average at best on boards
Lexy i feel has the most up side in this area
Radman doesn't seem instrested in mixing it up much
TC will hit the boards well and mix it up on the glass
Wallace boards very well and mixes it up . Our best rebounder
Diop is very soft on the boards and don't like to mix it up. Though he has the lynth and ability to board.
Brown . shows flashes , If he attacks the boards harder he could board well.
Henderson can get up ,mix it up , and should be very good on the boards

I feel Radman, Diop, and Diaw , need the most work in this area?

Going with a big line up helps more than any thing in this area.
If Boris or Wallace moves to two Those two can switch on the pick with ease.
Both Wallace and Boris can both post up more with smaller defenders. This mis match along is worth the change

TC and Lexy can both defend the rim on the pick all so . Both can challange the shot leaving the other to hit the board. Leaving only Felton or DJ to fight through the pick . But with the lynth of TC and Lexy recovery should be much easyer.
Position rebounding should be much better .

Resorting to a small back court causes us so many more disadvantages.

DJ , Henderson , Nazz , Bell off the beanch going with only a nine man rotation
Nazz backing up both TC and Lexy
Henderson backing up at s/g to give Boris and Wallace a rest
DJ backing up only Felton
Bell to stop a hot hand at the two or three position.
Only spot play for the rest of the team